A patient centered assessment of the 2016 ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria: evaluating the meaningfulness of response.

OBJECTIVES: The ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria (Total Improvement Score [TIS]) is a composite measure calculated using changes in myositis core set measures. It is unclear if achieving improvement per TIS reflects improvement in any symptoms of myositis patients. In this study, we examined the association between achieving TIS improvement and patient-centered outcome measures (PCOMs). METHODS: Adults with myositis were enrolled in a prospective study with baseline and 6-month visits. Six core set measures were collected at each visit along with the following PCOMs: Fatigue (visual analogue scale [VAS] and short form 36 [SF36]), pain (VAS, SF36), health-related quality of life (SF-36), physical function (PROMIS-physical function, SF36, sit-to-stand, timed up-and-go, and six-min walk) and physical activity (actigraphy). Mann-Whitney U was used to compare PCOMs between improvement groups. Spearman correlation and regression models were used for correlation and association between TIS and PCOMs, respectively. RESULTS: Of 50 patients (six polymyositis, 24 dermatomyositis, 9 necrotizing myopathy, 11 anti-synthetase syndrome) enrolled (mean age: 52, 60% female), 21 patients satisfied the TIS improvement criteria at 6-months. PCOMs including fatigue, pain, quality of life, physical activity and physical function demonstrated significantly greater improvement in patients who had minimal TIS improvement compared with those with no improvement. Greater PCOM improvements were seen with moderate-major TIS improvement. TIS correlated moderately-strongly with most PCOMs. CONCLUSION: Achieving improvement criteria was accompanied by significant clinical improvements in fatigue, pain, health-related quality of life, physical function, and physical activity. These results support the use of TIS as a clinically meaningful metric of improvement.

Agreement between local and central anti-synthetase antibodies detection: results from the Classification Criteria of Anti-Synthetase Syndrome project biobank.

OBJECTIVES: The CLASS (Classification Criteria of Anti-Synthetase Syndrome) project is a large international multicentre study that aims to create the first data-driven anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) classification criteria. Identifying anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibodies (anti-ARS) is crucial for diagnosis, and several commercial immunoassays are now available for this purpose. However, using these assays risks yielding false-positive or false-negative results, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. The established reference standard for detecting anti-ARS is immunoprecipitation (IP), typically employed in research rather than routine autoantibody testing. We gathered samples from participating centers and results from local anti-ARS testing. As an "ad-interim" study within the CLASS project, we aimed to assess how local immunoassays perform in real-world settings compared to our central definition of anti-ARS positivity. METHODS: We collected 787 serum samples from participating centres for the CLASS project and their local anti-ARS test results. These samples underwent initial central testing using RNA-IP. Following this, the specificity of ARS was reconfirmed centrally through ELISA, line-blot assay (LIA), and, in cases of conflicting results, protein-IP. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated. We also calculated the inter-rater agreement between central and local results using a weighted κ co-efficient. RESULTS: Our analysis demonstrates that local, real-world detection of anti-Jo1 is reliable with high sensitivity and specificity with a very good level of agreement with our central definition of anti-Jo1 antibody positivity. However, the agreement between local immunoassay and central determination of anti-non-Jo1 antibodies varied, especially among results obtained using local LIA, ELISA and "other" methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our study evaluates the performance of real-world identification of anti-synthetase antibodies in a large cohort of multi-national patients with ASSD and controls. Our analysis reinforces the reliability of real-world anti-Jo1 detection methods. In contrast, challenges persist for anti-non-Jo1 identification, particularly anti-PL7 and rarer antibodies such as anti-OJ/KS. Clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting anti-synthetase antibodies, especially when commercial immunoassays test positive for non-anti-Jo1 antibodies.

Collaborative research in myositis-related disorders: MIHRA, a global shared community model.

Myositis International Health and Research Collaborative Alliance (MIHRA) is a newly formed purpose-built non-profit charitable research organization dedicated to accelerating international clinical trial readiness, global professional and lay education, career development and rare disease advocacy in IIM-related disorders. In its long form, the name expresses the community's scope of engagement and intent. In its abbreviation, MIHRA, conveys linguistic roots across many languages, that reflects the IIM community's spirit with meanings such as kindness, community, goodness, and peace. MIHRA unites the global multi-disciplinary community of adult and pediatric healthcare professionals, researchers, patient advisors and networks focused on conducting research in and providing care for pediatric and adult IIM-related disorders to ultimately find a cure. MIHRA serves as a resourced platform for collaborative efforts in investigator-initiated projects, consensus guidelines for IIM assessment and treatment, and IIM-specific career development through connecting research networks.MIHRA's infrastructure, mission, programming and operations are designed to address challenges unique to rare disease communities and aspires to contribute toward transformative models of rare disease research such as global expansion and inclusivity, utilization of community resources, streamlining ethics and data-sharing policies to facilitate collaborative research. Herein, summarises MIHRA operational cores, missions, vision, programming and provision of community resources to sustain, accelerate and grow global collaborative research in myositis-related disorders.

Pain is Common in Myositis and Associated with Disease Activity.

BACKGROUND: Understanding pain in myositis remains challenging. This study aimed to assess patient-reported pain and its correlation with myositis core set measures (CSMs), patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and functional measures. METHODS: Fifty subjects underwent baseline, 3-month, and 6-month assessments, evaluating myositis CSMs, functional measures, and patient-reported outcomes. Pain was measured using three methods: (1) a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), (2) pain score from the HAQ-DI, and (3) SF-36 (Short Form survey) pain questions. Correlations between disease activity measures and pain were examined at baseline, and changes in both were assessed at 6 months, along with longitudinal change of pain. The change in pain was also correlated with the published 2016 ACR/EULAR myositis response criteria, physician/patient's assessment of change. RESULTS: Nearly half of patients (45%) reported moderate to severe pain in all 3 pain scales, with higher severity of pain in PM/NM subset. At baseline, pain severity showed a strong correlation with most CSMs, PROs and functional outcomes in all the 3 pain scales and similar trends were noted for change in pain at the 6 months. On longitudinal analysis, the physical function scores and fatigue showed strong correlation with pain. Pain improved in myositis patients with improvement in disease activity over time. CONCLUSIONS: Pain is common in myositis and is associated with multiple measures of disease activity, PROs, and functional outcomes in myositis. Most importantly pain improves with improvement in disease activity. SF-36 pain questions have good psychometric properties.

Patient reported outcome for physical function in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.

OBJECTIVES: There is an unmet need to develop patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM). To investigate the feasibility, compliance, and psychometric properties of NIH's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function-20 (PF-20) in a large U.S. IIM population. METHODS: "Myositis Patient Centered Tele-Research" (My PACER) is a multicentre prospective observational study of IIM patients, competitively recruited through traditional in-person clinic visits (Center-Based Cohort [CBC]), and remotely using smartphone and web-based technology (Tele-Research Cohort [TRC]). The CBC was further randomly divided (1:1 ratio) into a traditional local sub-cohort, and a remote sub-cohort. Data collected included PRO and other patient self-assessments monthly for 6 months. Clinician-reported outcomes were obtained at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: 120 IIM patients were enrolled (82 TRC/38 CBC, mean age 55 ± 13.4, 75% females, 81% Caucasians), with similar demographics and mean PROMIS PF-20 score between cohorts. The PROMIS PF-20 score was not associated with age, sex or race. The compliance and completion rates were similar between TRC and CBC as well as sub-cohorts. PROMIS PF-20 showed strong test-retest reliability at 1 month. PROMIS PF-20 was significantly associated with all core set measures except extra-muscular global and CK, as well as with most of symptoms, function and physical activity measures. PROMIS PF-20 illustrated concordant change with myositis response criteria and patient assessment, with a large effect size. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS PF-20 demonstrates favorable psychometric properties including reliability, validity and responsiveness in a large cohort of myositis patients, with similar adherence in local or remotely enrolled patients.

Serum cytokine profiles of adults with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of available biomarkers of disease activity in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), and serum cytokines/chemokines hold potential as candidate biomarkers. We aimed to determine serum cytokine profiles of IIM patients with active disease as compared to patients in remission and healthy controls. METHODS: The IIM patients with active disease (included patients enrolled in repository corticotropin injection trial), in remission, and healthy controls were enrolled in this cross-sectional observational study. Serum concentrations of 51 cytokines/chemokines were obtained by utilising a bead-based multiplex cytokine assay (Luminex®). The myositis core set measures were obtained for all the patients. Cytokines with the best predictive ability to differentiate these clinical groups were assessed with three methods: 1) Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator modelling, 2) stepwise approach, and 3) logistic regression model. RESULTS: Twenty-one IIM patients with active disease, 11 IIM patients in remission and 10 healthy controls were enrolled. Myositis patients had elevated levels of chemokines that attract eosinophils (eotaxin) and dendritic cells, NK cells, cytotoxic T-cells and monocytes/macrophages (CXCL-9, IP-10), cytokines that drive T-helper 1 responses (TNF-a, lymphotoxin-a), matrix degrading enzymes (MMP-3 and -9), and IGFBP-2 compared to healthy controls. Myositis patients with active disease had higher levels of lymphotoxin-a, CXCL-9, MIP-1a, MIP-1b and MMP-3 than patients in remission. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated differences in cytokine profiles of IIM patients (active and inactive disease) compared to healthy controls and identified some cytokines that could potentially be used as biomarkers. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to validate our findings.

Safety and tolerability of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with active dermatomyositis: results from the randomised, placebo-controlled ProDERM study.

BACKGROUND: Dermatomyositis is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy characterised by rashes and progressive muscle weakness. The recent ProDERM (Progress in DERMatomyositis) study is the first large randomised, placebo-controlled trial to establish the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in adult patients with dermatomyositis. Objectives of this analysis were to closely examine the safety and tolerability of IVIg in patients from the ProDERM study. METHODS: ProDERM was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. In the first period (weeks 0-16), adults with active dermatomyositis received 2.0 g/kg IVIg (Octagam 10%; Octapharma AG) or placebo every 4 weeks. In the open-label extension period (weeks 16-40), all patients received IVIg for 6 additional cycles; dose reduction (1.0 g/kg) was permitted if patients were stable. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were documented. RESULTS: The 95 patients enrolled were randomised to receive IVIg (N = 47) or placebo (N = 48) in the first period, with 5 switching from placebo to IVIg. Overall, 664 IVIg infusion cycles were administered. During the first period, 113 TEAEs were possibly/probably related to treatment in 30/52 patients (57.7%) receiving IVIg and 38 in 11 patients (22.9%) on placebo. Eight patients discontinued therapy due to IVIg-related TEAEs. Eight thromboembolic events (TEEs) occurred in six patients on IVIg; six in five patients were deemed possibly/probably related to IVIg. Patients with TEEs exhibited more baseline TEE risk factors than those without TEEs (2.4-15.2-fold higher). Lowering infusion rate reduced the rate of TEEs, and none occurred at the lower IVIg dose. No haemolytic transfusion reactions or deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study demonstrate that IVIg has a favourable safety profile for treatment of adult dermatomyositis patients and provides evidence that will help to inform treatment choice for these patients. Dermatomyositis patients receiving high-dose IVIg should be monitored for TEEs, and a low rate of infusion should be used to minimise TEE risk, particularly in those with pre-existing risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ProDERM study (NCT02728752).

Correlation between B cell epitope profile and clinical features of anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive (MDA5+) dermatomyositis patients exhibit a variety of clinical features. We therefore investigated whether patterns of B cell epitope recognition are linked to the clinical course of MDA5+ dermatomyositis. METHODS: Our cross-sectional study used ELISA-based methods to determine the relationship between antibody recognition of overlapping 155 amino acid MDA5 subfragments and clinical features of 24 MDA5+ myositis patients. Correlations between clinical features and standardized anti-MDA5 subfragment antibody titers were assessed via Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Twenty-four MDA5+ patients submitted serum samples within a median of 0 (interquartile range, 0-74) days from the initial clinic visit. In addition to typical dermatomyositis rashes, these patients exhibited muscle symptoms (n = 11), vascular dysfunction (n = 9), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) (n = 16). Female patients exhibited higher titers of antibodies recognizing fragment H (aa 905-1026) compared to male patients. Muscle involvement was associated with higher levels of anti-fragment F (aa 646-801) antibody. Conversely, patients with vascular abnormalities had higher anti-fragment B (aa 130-284) and E (aa 517-671) antibody titers than those without vascular dysfunction. Four patients died due to ILD progression and showed higher anti-fragment A (aa 1-155) antibody titers than the other 20 patients. Differences in the ratio of anti-fragment to anti-full length MDA5 antibody titers were found for sex (H: anti-MDA5) and vascular dysfunction (anti-fragment B, E: anti-MDA5). CONCLUSIONS: Various clinical features of MDA5+ dermatomyositis correlated with levels of antibodies targeting selected subfragments of this autoantigen, providing a link between fragment-specific immune responses and disease course.

Discordance between patient- and physician-reported disease activity in adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.

OBJECTIVES: Patient-reported global disease activity (patient-global) is a myositis core set measure. Understanding the drivers of patient-global is important in patient assessment, and disagreements between physician and patient perception of disease activity may negatively impact shared decision making. We examined the determinants of patient-global and discordance between patient-global and physician-reported global disease activity (physician-global) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). METHODS: Adults with IIM were enrolled in a prospective observational cross-sectional study. The following myositis outcome measures were collected: patient-global, physician-global, extramuscular and muscle disease activity, manual muscle testing, HAQ, creatine kinase, fatigue, pain, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function, 36-item Short Form, sit to stand, timed up and go, 6-minute walk and Actigraph steps/min/day count. A linear regression model was used to determine the contribution of each measure to patient-global. Discordance was defined as ≥3 points difference between patient-global and physician-global. RESULTS: Fifty patients [60% females; mean age 51.6 years (s.d. 14.9)] with probable/definite IIM (EULAR/ACR classification criteria for IIM) were enrolled. Physical function and fatigue measures contributed to patient-global the most, followed by measures of pain, physical activity, quality of life and muscle disease, while physician-global was primarily driven by muscle disease activity. Patient-global was discordant with physician-global in 30% of the patients, of which patient-global was higher than physician-global in 66%. Pain, fatigue and physical activity contributed more to patient-global than physician-global. CONCLUSION: Fatigue, pain and physical activity are important driving factors of the differences observed in the patient vs physician assessment of myositis disease activity. Understanding the gap between patient and physician perspectives may help provide better patient-centred care.

Performance of the 2016 ACR-EULAR myositis response criteria in juvenile dermatomyositis therapeutic trials and consensus profiles.

OBJECTIVES: The 2016 ACR-EULAR Response Criteria for JDM was developed as a composite measure with differential weights of six core set measures (CSMs) to calculate a Total Improvement Score (TIS). We assessed the contribution of each CSM, representation of muscle-related and patient-reported CSMs towards improvement, and frequency of CSM worsening across myositis response criteria (MRC) categories in validation of MRC. METHODS: Data from JDM patients in the Rituximab in Myositis trial (n = 48), PRINTO JDM trial (n = 139), and consensus patient profiles (n = 273) were included. Observed vs expected CSM contributions were compared using Sign test. Characteristics of MRC categories were compared by Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni adjustment. Spearman correlation of changes in TIS and individual CSMs were examined. Agreement between physician-assessed change and MRC categories was evaluated by weighted Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Of 457 JDM patients with IMACS CSMs and 380 with PRINTO CSMs, 9-13% had minimal, 19-23% had moderate and 41-50% had major improvement. The number of improved and absolute percentage change of CSMs increased by MRC improvement level. Patients with minimal improvement by MRC had a median of 0-1 CSM worsened, and those with moderate/major improvement had a median of zero worsening CSMs. Of patients improved by MRC, 94-95% had improvement in muscle strength and 93-95% had improvement in ≥1 patient-reported CSM. IMACS and PRINTO CSMs performed similarly. Physician-rated change and MRC improvement categories had moderate-to-substantial agreement (Kappa 0.5-0.7). CONCLUSION: The ACR-EULAR MRC perform consistently across multiple studies, supporting its further use as an efficacy end point in JDM trials.

Performance of the 2016 ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria in adult dermatomyositis/polymyositis therapeutic trials and consensus profiles.

OBJECTIVE: The ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) were developed as a composite measure using absolute percentage change in six core set measures (CSMs). We aimed to further validate the MRC by assessing the contribution of each CSM, frequency of strength vs extramuscular activity improvement, representation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), and frequency of CSM worsening. METHODS: Data from adult dermatomyositis/polymyositis patients in the rituximab (n = 147), etanercept (n = 14), and abatacept (n = 19) trials, and consensus patient profiles (n = 232) were evaluated. The Total Improvement Score (TIS), number of improving vs worsening CSMs, frequency of improvement with and without muscle-related CSMs, and contribution of PROM were evaluated by MRC category. Regression analysis was performed to assess contribution of each CSM to the MRC. RESULTS: Of 412 adults with dermatomyositis/polymyositis, there were 37%, 24%, 25%, and 14% with no, minimal, moderate, and major MRC improvement, respectively. The number of improving CSMs and absolute percentage change in all CSMs increased by improvement category. In minimal-moderate improvement, only physician-reported disease activity contributed significantly more than expected by MRC. Of patients with at least minimal improvement, 95% had improvement in muscle-related measures and a majority (84%) had improvement in PROM. Patients with minimal improvement had worsening in a median of 1 CSM, and most patients with moderate-major improvement had no worsening CSMs. Physician assessment of change generally agreed with MRC improvement categories. CONCLUSION: The ACR-EULAR MRC performs consistently across multiple studies, further supporting its use as an efficacy end point in future myositis therapeutic trials.

Coexisting autoantibodies against transcription factor Sp4 are associated with decreased cancer risk in patients with dermatomyositis with anti-TIF1γ autoantibodies.

OBJECTIVES: In dermatomyositis (DM), autoantibodies are associated with unique clinical phenotypes. For example, anti-TIF1γ autoantibodies are associated with an increased risk of cancer. The purpose of this study was to discover novel DM autoantibodies. METHODS: Phage ImmunoPrecipitation Sequencing using sera from 43 patients with DM suggested that transcription factor Sp4 is a novel autoantigen; this was confirmed by showing that patient sera immunoprecipitated full-length Sp4 protein. Sera from 371 Johns Hopkins patients with myositis (255 with DM, 28 with antisynthetase syndrome, 40 with immune-mediated necrotising myopathy, 29 with inclusion body myositis and 19 with polymyositis), 80 rheumatological disease controls (25 with Sjogren's syndrome, 25 with systemic lupus erythematosus and 30 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)) and 200 healthy comparators were screened for anti-SP4 autoantibodies by ELISA. A validation cohort of 46 anti-TIF1γ-positive patient sera from the University of Pittsburgh was also screened for anti-Sp4 autoantibodies. RESULTS: Anti-Sp4 autoantibodies were present in 27 (10.5%) patients with DM and 1 (3.3%) patient with RA but not in other clinical groups. In patients with DM, 96.3% of anti-Sp4 autoantibodies were detected in those with anti-TIF1γ autoantibodies. Among 26 TIF1γ-positive patients with anti-Sp4 autoantibodies, none (0%) had cancer. In contrast, among 35 TIF1γ-positive patients without anti-Sp4 autoantibodies, 5 (14%, p=0.04) had cancer. In the validation cohort, among 15 TIF1γ-positive patients with anti-Sp4 autoantibodies, 2 (13.3%) had cancer. By comparison, among 31 TIF1γ-positive patients without anti-Sp4 autoantibodies, 21 (67.7%, p<0.001) had cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-Sp4 autoantibodies appear to identify a subgroup of anti-TIF1γ-positive DM patients with lower cancer risk.

Systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease: a conceptual framework for subclinical, clinical and progressive disease.

OBJECTIVES: To establish a framework by which experts define disease subsets in systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). METHODS: A conceptual framework for subclinical, clinical and progressive ILD was provided to 83 experts, asking them to use the framework and classify actual SSc-ILD patients. Each patient profile was designed to be classified by at least four experts in terms of severity and risk of progression at baseline; progression was based on 1-year follow-up data. A consensus was reached if ≥75% of experts agreed. Experts provided information on which items were important in determining classification. RESULTS: Forty-four experts (53%) completed the survey. Consensus was achieved on the dimensions of severity (75%, 60 of 80 profiles), risk of progression (71%, 57 of 80 profiles) and progressive ILD (60%, 24 of 40 profiles). For profiles achieving consensus, most were classified as clinical ILD (92%), low risk (54%) and stable (71%). Severity and disease progression overlapped in terms of framework items that were most influential in classifying patients (forced vital capacity, extent of lung involvement on high resolution chest CT [HRCT]); risk of progression was influenced primarily by disease duration. CONCLUSIONS: Using our proposed conceptual framework, international experts were able to achieve a consensus on classifying SSc-ILD patients along the dimensions of disease severity, risk of progression and progression over time. Experts rely on similar items when classifying disease severity and progression: a combination of spirometry and gas exchange and quantitative HRCT.

Randomized Trial of Tocilizumab in the Treatment of Refractory Adult Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of tocilizumab in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in refractory adult patients with dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM). METHODS: Thirty-six subjects with probable or definite DM/PM were enrolled in a 6-month phase 2B clinical trial and randomized 1:1 to receive tocilizumab (8 mg/kg intravenously) or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. Eligible subjects had either a DM rash, a myositis-associated autoantibody or an adjudicated PM diagnosis. Active disease was defined by at least three of six abnormal core set measures (CSMs), including a manual muscle testing (MMT)-8 score of less than 136/150. If the MMT-8 score was greater than 136, then a cutaneous score of 3 or more (10 cm visual analogue scale) was required along with three additional abnormal CSMs indicating disease activity. The primary endpoint compared the Total Improvement Score (TIS) between both arms from week 4 to 24. Secondary outcomes included time to meeting minimal TIS improvement, changes in CSMs, time to worsening, steroid-sparing effect, proportion of subjects meeting more stringent improvement criteria, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (P = 0.86) in the TIS over 24 weeks between tocilizumab and placebo arms. The secondary endpoints of time to improvement (minimal, moderate, or major), time to worsening, CSM changes, safety outcomes, and steroid-sparing effect were also not significantly different between arms. CONCLUSION: Tocilizumab was safe and well tolerated but did not meet the primary or secondary efficacy outcomes in refractory DM and PM in this 24-week phase 2B study.

Current and new targets for treating myositis.

As treatment of refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) has been challenging, there is growing interest in assessing new therapies that target various pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of IIM. In the largest clinical trial to date, rituximab was studied in adult and juvenile myositis, but the primary outcome was not met despite 83 percent of subjects with refractory myositis meeting the definition of improvement. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently granted approval to Octagam 10% immune globulin intravenous (IVIg), for the treatment of adult dermatomyositis based on impressive results from a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) utility in IIM is not recommended and recent reports suggest this therapy may induce systemic autoimmune disease including myositis. Further, anti-IL6 therapy cannot be recommended as a recent trial of tocilizumab failed to reach its primary endpoint. Further studies are needed to assess the role of newer therapies such as abatacept (inhibition of T cell co-stimulation), sifalimumab (anti-IFNα), Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors, apremilast (phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor), and KZR-616 (selective inhibitor of the immunoproteasome) given their biological plausibility and encouraging recent small-case series results. The future of IIM therapy will depend on exploring biomarkers implicated in the etiopathogenesis of IIM, improvements in myositis classification based on serological and histopathological features, and well-designed controlled clinical trials using validated consensus outcome measures.

Glucocorticoids in Myositis: Initiation, Tapering, and Discontinuation.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: We discuss the evidence behind the use of glucocorticoids in myositis including a discussion of mechanism of action, dosing, tapering, and duration of therapy as well as glucocorticoid-related adverse events that are particularly important in myositis patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies showing reduction in mortality rates after the use of glucocorticoids, better outcomes in patients treated with glucocorticoids compared to those who did not, and reduction of inflammation in muscle biopsies provide low level evidence to support use of glucocorticoids in myositis. Early initiation of therapy is associated with better functional outcomes. Use of intravenous methylprednisolone in patients with severe disease may lead to quicker recovery and reduction in long-term glucocorticoid exposure. Steroid-related myopathy and osteoporosis are glucocorticoid side effects that are particularly relevant in myositis. The optimal dose and duration of glucocorticoid therapy in myositis currently remain elusive, and this review emphasizes the need for better quality studies in this area.

Defining anti-synthetase syndrome: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterised by multi-system involvement with a wide variety of manifestations. Validated classification criteria are necessary to improve recognition and prevent misclassification, especially given the lack of reliable and standardised autoantibody testing. We systematically reviewed the literature to analyse proposed ASSD criteria, characteristics, and diagnostic performance. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase databases (01/01/1984 to 06/11/2018) and the ACR and EULAR meeting abstracts (2017-2018). Sensitivities, specificities, positive, negative likelihood ratios and risk of bias were calculated for ASSD criteria and key variables reported in the literature. We performed meta-analysis when appropriate. RESULTS: We retrieved 4,358 studies. We found 85 proposed ASSD criteria from a total of 82 studies. All but one study included anti-synthetase autoantibody (ARS) positivity in the ASSD criteria. Most studies required only one ASSD feature plus anti-ARS to define ASSD (n=64, 78%), whereas 16 studies required more than one ASSD variable plus anti-ARS. The only criteria not including anti-ARS positivity required 5 ASSD clinical features. We found limited data and wide variability in the diagnostic performance of each variable and definition proposed in the literature. Given these limitations we only meta-analysed the performance of individual muscle biopsy and clinical variables in diagnosing ASSD, which performed poorly. CONCLUSIONS: The current ASSD criteria include a variety of serological, clinical, and histological features with wide variability amongst proposed definitions and the performance of these definitions has not been tested. This systematic literature review suggests the need for additional data and consensus-driven classification criteria for ASSD.

Role of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Necrotizing Autoimmune Myopathy.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a subtype of myositis that is associated with a refractory phenotype and poorer prognosis. The aim of the study was to provide single large center experience of outcomes of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for patients with IMNM using longitudinally collected data. METHODS: This case series longitudinally evaluated 4 of the 6 myositis core set measures at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after IVIg on 20 adult IMNM patients from 2014 to 2019 at the University of Pittsburgh. We assessed patients for improvement in core set measures, prednisone dose, adverse effects, and by the "limited" ACR/EULAR 2016 myositis response criteria. The mean differences in CK and manual muscle testing (MMT-8) were compared using a paired t test. A clinically significant response was defined as a >10% absolute improvement in the MMT-8 and a >50% absolute reduction in serum CK at 6 months of IVIg. RESULTS: Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment was associated with marked improvement in IMNM patients, with 85% of patient meeting clinically significant response. The median (interquartile range) relative percent improvement in CK level was 96% (85%-98%) and in MMT was 29% (14%-36%) at 6 months.There was a significant reduction in the mean (SD) dose of prednisone at 6 months and had minimal adverse effects. In addition, with IVIg, most (13/14) patients had at least minimal improvement as per ACR/EULAR 2016 myositis response criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Based on objective, meaningful improvement in MMT-8 and CK as well as marked reduction in prednisone doses with acceptable tolerability, early implementation of IVIg should be considered in adult IMNM.